March Report #1

After a short break from blogging, I’m here with the latest development around IOTA.

After the overwhelming news with Canonical and Innogy IOTA is finally showing its real character: An interoparable protocol and global standard for the IoT is forming.

Instead of hype-news to boost the price, we now see that the strategic management is driving the project into real-world-collaborations to make a difference.

We didn’t had to wait long for a press-reaction:

E.g.: International Business Times

Coinspeaker

Coindesk

Additional coverage by Ingo Fiedler, Research Director Blockchain Research Lab, University of Hamburg:

Properties of a Token-Based Machine Economy

The Distribution of IOTA Tokens

 

Here are the latest background news around the development of this cutting edge technology:



New transitioning-period (possibly) incoming due to some necessary changes:

Since the IOTA Reference Implementation (IRI) needs to be updated and prepared for the needs of the ecosystem, we can expect a further change and a following claiming-period.

This means that, when the time has come and the new IRI is pushed into Github, people need to claim their funds on their old seed and shift them into a new seed. This is supposedly possible with the GUI-wallet and done in a few minutes.

(image of the wallet-integrated claiming-procedure)

I  recommend to join our slack and look into it every now and then, to be able to keep track of everything.



 

IOTA on Mobile World Congress 2017 in Barcelona

Since IOTA partnered with Canonical, a micro billing solution has been presented on the Mobile World Congress between Feb. 27 and March 2nd in Barcelona.

I’m pretty sure we will get a comprehensive report soon, where new collaborations and additions will be written down for us.

A meaningful congress like the MWC is a perfect opportunity for IOTA to get new partners on board.

We shouldn’t take the foundations great work for granted though.

They are working relentlessly for a successful enterprise of IOTA, thanks for that!

 



 

Consensus Masterclass

Last but not least, an insightful protocol of the community-developer interface of the “Consensus Masterclass”.

Scott stepped forward and saved the following conversation for us.

To be honest: This is pretty long but worth a read if you struggle to understand the “consensus” of  the IOTA Tangle.

If you have technical questions, it’s always a good way to join our slack and reach out for our developers to get solid answers!

Link to the Forum-entry.

 

One exemplary answer was this:

 

Come-from-Beyond then explained what these pictures show and how to view consensus within IOTA:

The main question that arises sounds approximately this way: how can you achieve a consensus if Random Walk Monte Carlo algorithm gives different gray squares?

Let’s look at these pictures… we see that green squares are referenced no matter what gray square was picked by the Monte Carlo. This is the nuance which some people don’t see.

We come to consensus on the status of green squares only.

More time passes – more transactions added – and eventually those white squares will be colored with green too.;

We don’t know if young transactions are legitimate or not, but old ones are legitimate with very high probability (if they are referenced by the majority of tips returned by the Monte Carlo Random Walk).

Participants were then invited to ask questions:

Question by Pascal L:
If each node has a different view of the tangle, then that would mean also a different set of Tips, right?
Now the consensus was reached here because we all used the same view of the tangle with the same set of Tips…what if I have a different set of tips that reference other transactions?

Come-from-Beyond:
If our views diverge too much we won’t come to consensus, private subtangles branch-out and extra effort is required for them to branch-in later. There will still be some “green” transactions even we diverge, these are transactions we came to consensus on. They’ll be just very old though. Worse connectivity between you and me = older txs with “green” status will be.


Question by Scott J:
Before I didn’t realise at what point transaction get ‘confirmed’ without a Coordinator. So effectively, it is when they are referenced by all tips?

Come-from-Beyond:
Not by all tips, you set confirmation level for yourself. You may decide that if 95 tips of 100 returned by Monte Carlo reference your tx then it’s legit. Some merchants may wait for 99 of 100.


Question by Michael K:
Is every node free (no protocol rules etc.), which squares have to be picked for a new tip for referencing?

Come-from-Beyond:
The protocol doesn’t enforce tip selection algo, but for the system to work the nodes should use similar algos. A higher difference in the algos – longer adaptation period will be (adaptation period = time required for a tx to become “green”).

Michael K:
And if a group is using a different alog, which is placing a lot of tips, which are referencing to ‘old’ transactions (the green squares on the left side in the example)?

Come-from-Beyond:
If their algo is too bad then their txs won’t be referenced by the others. We use algo which benefits others for using it too.

Michael K:
So there is an algo (tip selection) in the reference implementation, which you should follow, or at least should not differ too much, because you will risk that the group which is using the reference implementation (or a similar tip selection algo) will never reference your tips?

Come-from-Beyond:
Yes.


Question by Pascal L:
So all nodes should still have close to all transactions to come to consensus. The less transactions of the whole tangle I have, the smaller the number of confirmed transactions.
Ah and that is why a narrow tangle is not good, as then one missing transaction can lead to all other transactions to not be confirmed?

Come-from-Beyond:
Yes, narrow tangle is bad


Question by Michael K:
If some nodes will never refer some tips, these tips still exist as tips also from their point of view, or do tips which didn’t get a reference over a a specific time ‘die’?

Come-from-Beyond:
They keep sticking around.

Michael K:
Why is it necessary to keep them sticking around, even if they didn’t get any reference over a very long time?

Come-from-Beyond:
It’s not necessary, they are just kept on some nodes, recently joining nodes will likely not see these tips

Michael K:
So a node can safely forget about this tips after a specific time?

Come-from-Beyond:
Yes.

project Shift
Shouldn’t we implement a “lost old tip” tie-up algo also? I mean, if they are open forever, they can always be referenced and create a useless branch. If somehow we “close” them by doing some housekeeping and tie them up to a recent one?

Come-from-Beyond:
The protocol doesn’t enforce this, you can create something for removing tips but they don’t interfere into tangle evolution


Question by Pascal L:
Whats the big difference then between the tangle and a blockchain? If the tangle still needs most of the transactions to get confirmed transactions, then why should it scale that much better?

Come-from-Beyond:
In tangle there is no a single point of bottleneck (miners).

Pascal L:
No, but there still is the bandwidth and size issue?
If every machine uses it to make transactions, then that will be 100k’s if not million transactions second. No node could ever keep up with that?

Come-from-Beyond:
Nodes can split the burden and solve this problem in swarm-like manner. IOTA is designed with this approach in mind.

Pascal L:
So I have that picture in mind where we have that huge tangle that no single node can run, now I was thinking that can be solved making branch tangles or sub tangles, that branch of and from there on will reference only the branch tangle transactions.
Which if I understand it right is the same logic of offline tangels…but if thats the case, how can double spends be detected?

Come-from-Beyond:
They can’t be detected if you don’t see most of issued txs, if majority of txs reference your tx then there is no a doublespending with high probability.

If you are a small merchant with low-end hardware then I suggest you listen for new txs and pick part of them and then fetching txs they reference until you see your tx.


Question by Pascal L:
So how do offline transactions work on a offline tangle?

Come-from-Beyond:
We add extra assumptions like the inability of all participants to doublespend before connection to global tangle is restored. If you can’t use such an assumption then you can use multisigs, create a big multisig address, make sure it’s confirmed and then go offline.

Once your connection is restored you’ll need to broadcast your private subtangle to the rest of the network and connect it by issuing a tx referencing the both tangles.

Pascal L:
So offline tangles will be used for inner company transactions or where ever, where there is trust that the original funds don’t get moved until the offline transactions are merged to the main tangle?

Come-from-Beyond:
There are several tricks to assure that doublespending won’t happen, if we remove trust-based ones then we still have security deposits – an assurance that you won’t doublespend and if you will then it will be covered from the deposit.

Also, multi-sig: if Samsung sells you hardware with IOTA inside and it’s digitally signed then you can be sure that it won’t doublespend.


Question by Pascal L:
So assuming that IOTA will gain adoption to where most IoT devices use it and there are 100k’s of transactions per second, who will run those super nodes that can handel such amounts of transactions? Large company’s?
Cause obviously my Notebook will not be able to run a full node then any more.

Come-from-Beyond:
Why supernodes?

Pascal L:
Lets say there are 100k TPS…won’t that require a really strong server?

Come-from-Beyond:
Yes, or 100 weak ones.

Pascal L:
Now thats the interesting part! So there could be pools for full nodes, like there are pools for Bitcoin mining? So hundred small businesses could connect and pool a full node?

Come-from-Beyond:
Yes, as an example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MapReduce7

If you find that this has sparked further questions feel free to ask them below or join us in the IOTA Slack here: http://slack.iota.org

 



I’m curious what March brings us next. Considering the latest development and the great efforts of the IOTA-Foundation, I’m pretty sure we will see a lot more in the first quarter of 2017.

An exchange listing is on our doorstep as far as I can tell.

Let’s be patient and be happy about the overall fantastic achievements of IOTA so far.

Thanks for reading,

Limo.

 

Leave a Reply